Black History Visionaries

Tampon Lawsuit Demands No Taxation on Menstruation!

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.
Energizer Holdings Inc. Playtex brand tampons sit on display in a supermarket in Princeton, Illinois, U.S., on Wednesday, April 30, 2014. Energizer Holdings Inc., known for its battery-powered pink bunny and Schick shavers, plans to separate its household products and personal-care units into two publicly traded companies. Photographer: Daniel Acker/Bloomberg via Getty Images

New York ‘Tampon Tax’ Lawsuit

NEW YORK — Any woman will tell you, that time of the month sucks. And what sucks even more — being taxed for tampons, according to five women who are suing New York State.

That’s right, they say — no to taxation on menstruation!

The class-action lawsuit wants New York to stop imposing a 4% “luxury tax” on feminine hygiene…. because ain’t nothing luxurious about it.

They point to the fact that men products like Rogaine, dandruff shampoo and condoms are exempt from the luxury tax, so why not tampons? Even the FDA even calls tampons medical necessities.

The women are seeking immediate relief from tax, class action status and restitution and damages in an amount to be determined at trial.

But with New York women reportedly paying  $14 million in taxes on feminine hygiene products each year, this could be a hell of a settlement.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.